Bantuan Sara Hidup (BSH), the national cash transfer program formerly known as BR1M, has undergone many changes since its introduction in 2012. In 2018, it was changed yet again, with a new benefit structure that took into account variations in household size. Its proponents argue that cash transfer programs have beneficial impacts on low-income household–while detractors argue that cash assistance discourages work, and that households should instead be self-reliant. But just how effective are cash transfer programs like BSH compared to other types of assistance? How can BSH be further improved? What is the role of BSH in the future of social welfare in Malaysia?
Bantuan Sara Hidup (BSH)
Expert
Calvin Cheng
Calvin is a Fellow in the Economics, Trade, and Regional Integration division at the Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia, where he leads the Institute's Economics research. His work spans issues in applied economics, including labour markets, social protection, economic development, and the design of public policy instruments such as transfer and benefit programmes. Calvin's research has been published in journals like the National Bureau of Asian Research's (NBR) Asia Policy and the Japan Economic Foundation’s Spotlight, and his work has been featured in numerous media outlets including Forbes, Al Jazeera, and Nikkei Asia. Calvin has collaborated and consulted for federal and state governments, international organizations like the World Bank, and multinational corporations such as Google. He holds a Master of Science in Public Policy from the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and a Bachelor of Economics in Econometrics from Monash University Clayton.
By: Calvin Cheng